Caesalpinia pulcherrima as Corrosion Inhibitor for Mild Steel in Acid Medium

 

C.V. Deepaa1*, V.G. Vasudha2 and T. Sathiyapriya1

1Department of Chemistry, Govt. Arts College, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu-641018 INDIA

2Department of Chemistry, Nirmala College, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu-641018 INDIA

*Corresponding Author E-mail: cvdeepaa@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

The inhibition efficacy of the extract of Caesalpinia pulcherrima for the corrosion of mild steel in 1N hydrochloric acid was investigated by weight loss, potentiodynamic polarization, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) techniques. The results indicate that CP flowers serve as a good corrosion inhibitor of mixed type with efficiency as high as 95% at 0.6% inhibitor concentration.

 

KEYWORDS: Caesalpinia pulcherrima, mild steel, acid medium, corrosion inhibitor.

 


 

INTRODUCTION:

Several industries use acid solutions for cleaning, de-scaling and pickling of steel structures. These processes are normally accompanied by considerable dissolution of the metal. Corrosion inhibitors are used to reduce the loss due to metal dissolution. Compounds containing hetero atoms like N, S, O and inorganic compounds like chromates, phosphates, molybdates etc are being investigated as corrosion inhibitors1-6.  The organic compounds can adsorb on the metal surface, block the active sites and thereby reduce corrosion rate. As most of the synthetic compounds are toxic and cause severe environmental hazards, use of plant extract7-14 as eco-friendly, non-toxic and harmless corrosion inhibitor is of significance.

 

This study is aimed at investigating the effectiveness of Caesalpinia pulcherrima (CP) flowers as corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in 1N hydrochloric acid by weight loss, polarization, impedance and SEM techniques.

 

EXPERIMENTAL:

Material preparation:

Mild steel sheet of about 1.5 mm thickness was mechanically cut to form coupons each of dimension 5 × 1cm2. The surface preparation of the mechanically polished specimen was carried out using different grades of emery paper and then degreasing with acetone.

 

They were finally washed with deionized water, dried and stored in a desiccator. Accurate weights of the samples were taken using electronic balance. The exposed area for polarization studies of the mild steel specimen was 1cm2.

 

Inhibitor preparation:

The stock solution of the inhibitor material (Caesalpinia pulcherrima extract) was prepared by refluxing 15g of dry CP powdered flowers with 500ml of 1N hydrochloric acid (Analar grade) for 3 hours. The refluxed solution was allowed to stand overnight and filtered. The residue was repeatedly washed with small quantities of 1N hydrochloric acid and the filtrate was made up to 500ml. From this stock solution different concentrations of the extract from 0.006 % to 0.6 % v/v were prepared.

 

Weight loss Method:

Weighed mild steel specimens were suspended in 1N hydrochloric acid in triplicate in the absence and presence of various concentrations of the inhibitor for different intervals of time (Table -1). The coupons were then removed from the test solution, thoroughly washed with sodium bicarbonate solution, then with deionized water, dried well and then weighed. The inhibition efficiency (%IE) was calculated using the formula (1).

 

Temperature study:

Weight loss determinations were carried out at different temperatures viz 303K, 313K, 323K, 333K, 343K, 353K. After initial weighing, the specimens were immersed in 100 ml of blank 1N hydrochloric acid and in 1N hydrochloric acid containing different concentrations (0.006% to 0.6% v/v) of the plant extract at the above temperatures. The thermostat was set to the appropriate temperature and after 1hr immersion the specimens were removed, washed, dried, and reweighed.

 

Calculation of corrosion parameters:

1. Inhibitor efficiency (IE %):

The Inhibitor Efficiency was calculated using the formula

IE (%)   =    

Weight loss without inhibitor – Weight loss with inhibitor×100        (1)

              Weight loss without inhibitor

 

2.  Corrosion rate (CR):

The corrosion rate was determined using the formula

Corrosion rate =   534 × Weight loss × 1000                (2)

                                            DAT

Where, D= Density (7.9 g/cm3 for mild steel).

A= Area in square inches.

T= Time in hours.

 

3. Electrochemical studies:

Electrochemical experiments were performed in a conventional three electrodes cell assembly with mild steel as working electrode, a platinum electrode as counter electrode and saturated calomel electrode as reference electrode.

 

The polarization measurements were performed with Parstat 2273. Potentiodynamic anodic and cathodic polarisation curves were obtained in the potential range -0.2mv to -1mv with a scan rate of 2mv/s relative to the corrosion potential (Ecorr). Extrapolation of the cathodic branch of the polarization curve back to Ecorr gave values for corrosion current density (Icorr). Measurements of Rp in the vicinity of Ecorr were also carried out. Impedance spectra (EIS) were recorded at Ecorr in the frequency range 0 to 10000 Hz.

 

SEM Studies:

The surface morphology of the specimen after immersion for 1 hr at 30oC in 1N blank hydrochloric acid and in 1N hydrochloric acid  containing 0.6% v/v of inhibitor was performed on a JSM-6390 scanning electronic microscope.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The IE of the plant extract in 1N hydrochloric acid as calculated by gravimetric method with different inhibitor concentrations and different immersion periods is indicated in Table1

 

The IE was found to increase from 21.73% at inhibitor concentration of 0.006% v/v up to 95.65% at inhibitor concentration of 0.6% for 1 hour immersion (Figure-1). Above 0.6% inhibitor concentration there was not much change in efficiency. Corrosion rate is found to decrease with increase in inhibitor concentration and with increased immersion time in acid. The corrosion inhibition may be due to adsorption of the phytoconstituents on the metal surface making a barrier for mass and charge transfers and thus protecting the metal surface from corrosion. The degree of protection increases with increasing surface coverage by the adsorbed molecules.

 

Fig. 1 Variation of inhibitor efficiency with concentration at various immersion periods in presence of   Caesalpinia pulcherrima in 1N HCl

 

The decrease of IE with increase in immersion time (Figure-2) from 1 hr to 24 hrs may be due to physisorption and desorption of the phytoconstituents which happens with increase in time whereby the metal surface becomes exposed.

 

Fig. 2 Variation of inhibitor efficiency with immersion time in presence of Caesalpinia pulcherrima extract in 1N HCl

 

Fig. 3 Variation of corrosion rate with temperature at different concentrations of Caesalpinia pulcherrima extract in 1N HCl

 


 

Table 1 Inhibition Efficiency and Corrosion Rate of mild steel in 1N HCl at different immersion periods and different concentrations of CP extract

S. No

Conc. of inhibitor

% v/v

1 hr

3 hr

5 hr

7hr

24hr

CR mpy

IE%

CR mpy

IE%

CR mpy

IE%

CR mpy

IE%

CR mpy

IE%

1.

Blank

1943

-

1323

-

929.4

-

808.70

-

528.0

-

2.

0.006

1520

21.73

1098

17.02

760.4

1818

627.60

22.38

468.2

11.33

3.

0.015

1182

39.13

985.7

25.5

591.4

36.36

398.30

50.74

306.2

42.00

4.

0.045

506.9

73.9

788.6

40.4

422.4

54.54

301.70

62.68

249.9

52.60

5.

0.06

422.4

78.2

675.9

48.9

371.7

60.00

289.60

64.17

211.2

60.00

6.

0.15

337.9

82.60

535.1

59.5

253.4

72.72

144.80

82.08

102.09

80.60

7.

0.3

168.9

91.30

309.8

76.5

168.9

81.81

120.70

85.07

88.01

80.30

8.

0.6

84.49

95.65

140.8

89.3

84.49

90.90

96.5

88.05

63.37

88.00

 

Table – 3 Thermodynamic parameters of Adsorption of CP for mild steel in 1N HCl

S. No

Conc. of inhibitor (% v/v)

-ΔG (kJ/mol)

ΔHads

kJ/mol

ΔSads

kJ/mol

303K

313K

323K

333K

343K

353K

1.

0.006

19.75

19.16

21.64

22.78

20.22

20.84

11.576

-0.0279

2.

0.045

20.53

17.57

18.39

20.52

19.41

17.82

24.569

0.0169

3.

0.15

18.79

16.29

17.71

19.41

17.20

14.88

31.55

0.0432

4.

0.6

19.16

14.02

15.77

17.20

16.82

17.18

16.757

0.002

 

Table –4 Electrochemical parameters for the corrosion of mild steel in 1N HCl with different concentrations of CP extract

S. No

Conc. of inhibitor % v/v

-Ecorr   mV

Icorr

mA cm-2

bc mV/dec

ba mV/dec

Rp Ω

CR mpy

IE (%)

Icorr

1.

Blank

484.255

1.024 x 103

178.739

81.819

3.014

4.719 x102

-

2.

0.015

475.138

5.379 x 102

179.059

65.965

3.597

2.479 x 102

47.47

3.

0.15

475.024

4.236 x 102

182.328

91.861

3.727

1.952 x 102

58.63

4.

0.6

476.707

3.859 x 102

180.128

77.920

4.066

1.778 x 102

62.31

 

 


Effect of temperature:

The results of temperature studies on CR are given in Table-2. The corrosion rate in general increases with temperature (Fig-3). This may be due to the fact that increase in temperature accelerates corrosive process. It is also found that the corrosion rate decreased considerably with increase in concentration of inhibitor for all temperatures studied showing that inhibition of corrosion takes place by adsorption process. At higher inhibitor concentration range, the inhibitor efficiency is almost the same for all temperatures indicating that it could be safely used up to 353K.

 

Electrochemical experiments:

The potentiodynamic polarization and impedance parameters are presented in Table - 3 and 4 respectively. Icorr values decrease with increasing concentration of extract confirming that corrosion inhibition is due to adsorption of the phytoconstituents. Ecorr values did not vary, indicating mixed mode of inhibition. The values of Tafel constant ba and bc are changed in presence of extract, though there is more change from blank for ba. This suggests that though the inhibition is mixed mode, the effect of inhibitor on the anodic polarization is more pronounced than on cathodic polarization.  The increasing linear polarization (Rp) values also confirm the corrosion inhibiting nature of plant extract.

 

Figure-4 shows the potentiodynamic polarisation curve for mild steel in 1N hydrochloric acid in the absence and presence of different concentrations of the plant extract.  Both anodic and cathodic reactions are inhibited as seen from the shape of the polarization curve.

 

Fig. 4 Potentiodynamic polarization plot for mild steel in 1N HCl with plant extract

 

Fig. 5 Nyquist plot for mild steel in 1N HCl in presence of plant extract

The Nyquist plot (Fig.5) shows semicircles with increasing diameter with increase in concentration of inhibitor.  The increasing charge transfer resistance Rct values (Table - 4) indicate reduced corrosion rate in presence of inhibitor and decreasing Cdl values imply adsorption of plant constituents on metal surface

 

SEM studies:

The scanning electron microscope photograph of the specimen in  blank 1N acid and in acid containing 0.6% v/v plant extract are shown in photograph 1 and 2.  Comparison of the photographs shows less corrosion in acid with inhibitor and heavy corrosion of mild steel in blank 1N hydrochloric acid.

 

Photograph 1  Mild steel specimen immersed in blank 1N HCl

 

Photograph 2 Mild steel specimens immersed in 1N HCl with 0.6% v/v CP extract

 

Mechanism:

CP contains tannins15, flavonoid16 (a,b), peltogynoids17 (c) and diterpenes18 (d) as the  major constituents and these may get adsorbed on the metal surface through the hetero atoms. The adsorption of these constituents on the mild steel might probably bring about the inhibition of mild steel dissolution.

(a)

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

(d)

 

CONCLUSION:

The CP flower extract acts as a good corrosion inhibitor for mild steel. Inhibitor efficiency of 95% is obtained for 0.6% v/v inhibitor concentration. Potentiodynamic studies indicate that the inhibitor exhibits mixed mode action inhibiting both anodic and cathodic process. Corrosion rate decreased considerably with increase in concentration of inhibitor for all temperatures studied showing that inhibition of corrosion takes place by adsorption process.

 

REFERENCES:

1.       S.K. Bag, S.B.Chakraborty, A. Roy and S.R. Chaudhuri., Bulletin of Electrochemistry, 1997, 13(1), 8-12.

2.       V. Ramesh saliyan and Airody Vasudeva Adhikari., Bulletin of Material Science, 2008,31(4), 699-711.

3.       A.K. Dubey and G. Singh., Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta, 2007, 25, 249-262.

4.       T.Horvath and E. Kalman., Russian Journal of Electrochemistry, 2000, 36(10), 1085-1091.

5.       E.E. Ebenso, Hailemichael Alemu, S.A. Umorea, I.B. Obot, International Journal of   Electrochemical Science, 2008, 3, 1325-1339.

6.       K.Gamal Gomma,  H.Mostafa Wahdan,  Material Chemistry and Physics, 1995, 39, 209-213.

7.       E.E. Ebenso, N.O. Eddy, and A.O. Odiongenyl, African Journal of Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2008, 2(11), 107-115.

8.       J. Buchweishaiji and G.S. Mhinzi, Portugaliae Electrochemica Acta, 2008, 26, 257-265.

9.       R. Saratha and V.G.Vasudha, E. Journal of Chemistry, 2009, 6(4), 1003-1008.

10.     Nnabuk Okaon Eddy., International Journal of Physical Sciences, 2009, 4(4), 165-171.

11.     A. Y. El-Etre, Applied Surface Science, 2006, 252, 8521-8525.

12.     E.Emeke Ozuzie., Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2006, 441-446.

13.     Pandian, Bothi Raja., Mathur Gopalakrishnan Sethuraman, Iran Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2009, 28(1), 7-84.

14.     K.O. Orubite, N.C. Oforka, Materials Letter, 2004, 58, 1768-1772.

15.     K.K. Awasthi, Anoop Kumar and K. Misra, Phytochemistry, 1980, 19, 1995-1997.

16.     K.V.N.S. Srinivas, Y. Koteshwara Rao, Biswanath Das, et al., Phytochemistry, 2003, 63,789-793

17.     D. David McPherson, A.Geoffrey Cordell, D.Djaja.Soejarto, M. John Pezzuto and H.S.Harry  Fong, Phytochemistry, 1983, 22(12), 2835-2838.

18.     Chun-Tao Che, D.David McPherson, A.Geoffrey Cordell, H.S.Harry  Fong, Journal of Natural Products, 1986, 49(4), 561-569.

 

 

 

 

Received on 11.01.2011        Modified on 20.02.2011

Accepted on 28.02.2011        © AJRC All right reserved

Asian J. Research Chem. 4(5): May, 2011; Page 722-725